We got couples inviting bulls into relationships but what about couples inviting a cuckold into a relationship

[luvymayfly2]

Maybe I missed that thread. But, we see so many couples with a cuckold husband inviting a bull into their dynamic. But, what about couples inviting a cuck to be their third? How do single cucks feel about that?

[LawyerWouldbeCuckold]

Umm......not tracking. Cuckoldry is understood as a man with a wife; and the wife has extra-marital sex; while the husband is monogamous to her. How do you "invite" a cuck into a relationship with a man and a wife who are married? (Or in a committed relationship).

And,....how is it possible to a be a "single" cuck??

Per my definition above, I thought you had to be married (or in a committed relationship) to be a cuck.

Can you clarify what exactly you are looking for?

[trecital]

"A couple inviting a cuck to be their third"
So, a married man has another man fucking his wife, defining him as a 'cuck'. A second married couple invite this cuckold to be their "third". Third what, exactly?
No, I don't get it

[mattyg_2671]

It doesn’t work. Sorry.

[inivisibletwin]

Maybe I missed that thread. But, we see so many couples with a cuckold husband inviting a bull into their dynamic. But, what about couples inviting a cuck to be their third? How do single cucks feel about that?

do you mean to suggest a dynamic where a married couple invites a single guy to be their third, but that guy doesnt actually get involved, he just watches, hears about their sessions afterward, or perhaps subs to them?

becuase, by definition, that would not be a "cuckold" situation. Either that couple are simply exhibitionists looking for an audience, or they are doms looking for a sub. perfectly valid dynamics (among consenting adults), but by definition not cuck.

by definition, a cuck is a person in a committed relationship with a partner who sleeps with other people (can be male or female, though male cucks are more common). So the person being invited to sleep with the partner is the bull. thats just what the term for that is.

not all cucks are submissive and into humiliation. the line between cuck and stag is very narrow.

but yeah, could you elaborate more? perhaps we are simply not understanding what you are asking

[ktcouple]

If you'd invite a cuckold into a relationship, that would be basically no different from being a voyeur to a couple. Cuckolding is based on the bond within the primary relationship, the role of the cuckold makes no sense without it.

[frank12]

I think I understand the disconnect that most have expressed above - since for most the role of cuckold seems to demand there is a cuckoldress involved as the primary foil for cuckoldry in the relationship and if that premise is taken the idea of a "single cuckold" is a non sequitur.

But then, since we all agree that rigid definitions of terms are nearly impossible with the variations in people, personalities and situations we know exist....

Consider the person who has long been a cuckold but finds himself by some turn of fate without his cuckoldress, without the foil defining a cuckold relationship. Is it reasonable to then say that the absence of that other half of the relationship divests him of his very nature of being a cuckold? Or would he then be a "wannabe" cuckold? Regardless of how others see this, the important part is probably how he sees himself, and the idea of understanding himself as a "single cuckold" is not too far out of bounds.

The next complex part is how a couple would interact with the single cuckold (what would the cuckold want, what would they get out of it?). I suspect there are eleventy bajillion answers there, but offering an outlet for a woman who enjoys expressing her dominant side with a husband who likes to see her fire given free rein, or simply the very discreet but exhibitionistic couple who don't risk the more typical venues but find it fascinating to have that appreciative audience are two possibles. The terms for those roles might be "submissive" or "voyeur" but are those terms unable to coexist with the term "single cuckold"?

Difficult to find such situations but clearly not zero probabilities.

Prof Wood

[inivisibletwin]

I think I understand the disconnect that most have expressed above - since for most the role of cuckold seems to demand there is a cuckoldress involved as the primary foil for cuckoldry in the relationship and if that premise is taken the idea of a "single cuckold" is a non sequitur.

But then, since we all agree that rigid definitions of terms are nearly impossible with the variations in people, personalities and situations we know exist....

Consider the person who has long been a cuckold but finds himself by some turn of fate without his cuckoldress, without the foil defining a cuckold relationship. Is it reasonable to then say that the absence of that other half of the relationship divests him of his very nature of being a cuckold? Or would he then be a "wannabe" cuckold? Regardless of how others see this, the important part is probably how he sees himself, and the idea of understanding himself as a "single cuckold" is not too far out of bounds.

The next complex part is how a couple would interact with the single cuckold (what would the cuckold want, what would they get out of it?). I suspect there are eleventy bajillion answers there, but offering an outlet for a woman who enjoys expressing her dominant side with a husband who likes to see her fire given free rein, or simply the very discreet but exhibitionistic couple who don't risk the more typical venues but find it fascinating to have that appreciative audience are two possibles. The terms for those roles might be "submissive" or "voyeur" but are those terms unable to coexist with the term "single cuckold"?

Difficult to find such situations but clearly not zero probabilities.

Prof Wood

ok, yeah, i can see that. I've been a cuck to my wife for more than a decade. My wife spent last might in her boyfriend's bed. but, hypothetically speaking, if my wife and I were to split up and i found my self single, I would still have the desire to be with a woman who slept with other guys, but finding such a woman and establishing a strong foundation, such as I have with my wife, from which she can cuckold me and have it mean anything, takes time and effort, and the right woman... I can see how, in that situation, having a couple invite me in as third, to fill the role of cuck, could be attractive and have merit.

I could see building a friendship with the "bull," while forming a non-sexual intimate relationship with the hotwife, wherein I get to hear all about their sexual adventures, and even watch, but never participate.

This seems like the least common situation, though, as the real thrill of cuckolding (for me, at least) is the woman i love, whom i've spent years developing a real relationship with, whom I know intimately because i share a life with, whom (under vanilla circumstances) I would be the primary / only sexual partner, getting her sexual needs met by other men, and not me... so this other arrangement, where I'm invited to cuck another established relationship feels initially like a shallow substitute who's novelty would where of quick.

in other words, the way i see it, this would be a fun temporary placeholder, while i try to find a new life partner.

essentially, i want the woman I share my life with to share her body with other men. I want my wife to go on a date with another guy, spend the night in his bed, then come home to me the next day and tell me all about her date, over breakfast.

I want the woman who i plan life events with, and build a life with, and know everything about her, to deny me access to her vagina while giving it to another guy.

I want to be my wife's primary LIFE partner, while simultaneously being her least priority SEXUAL partner.

and established relationship I am invited into as a 3rd, as a cuck, would not fill that need long term, i think...