Cuckcuckgoose1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:46 pm100%. I wish some posters would just STFU.Dream Weaver wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:57 amSo many people have turned this into a choose your own adventure tale.

🫵

Cuckcuckgoose1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:46 pm100%. I wish some posters would just STFU.Dream Weaver wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:57 amSo many people have turned this into a choose your own adventure tale.

🫵

That's because Danny doesn't give a minute by minute account of what he, Lauren and Adam are up to. It's only to be expected, that when we haven't heard from him for, say, five minutes, that people will start to fill the gaping void left by his absence, and start speculating about his motives, his thoughts, the colour of his underwear, what he had for breakfast. Ad infinitum.Dream Weaver wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:57 amSo many people have turned this into a choose your own adventure tale.
Lauren had said at the beginning when in the planning stage- that she doesn't want family and friends to know. So the 3rd can't be from the known circle. That's when they chose the App route.Georgematthias wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 1:48 pmIf Lauren does reveal this to her trusted sister, it would be a good thing for Lauren whether she reveals Adam's name or not. Just as Danny has OHW to seek advice and unload, Lauren may need a place to do the same - in addition to Danny. They've done pretty well to this point and I'm for their continued success. They seem to be able to sort through this pretty well.
We should feel privileged Danny is including us as spectators. I do. I like the guy.
There are 1,554 posts on this thread. Danny has posted 239 posts almost all of them on this thread. So there are five or six responses to every post by him. Dan’s posts alone would take up a dozen or so pages. But without any responses, I doubt that Danny would be posting.Cuckcuckgoose1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:46 pm100%. I wish some posters would just STFU.Dream Weaver wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:57 amSo many people have turned this into a choose your own adventure tale.
sandy691196 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 6:43 pmLauren had said at the beginning when in the planning stage- that she doesn't want family and friends to know. So the 3rd can't be from the known circle. That's when they chose the App route.Georgematthias wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 1:48 pmIf Lauren does reveal this to her trusted sister, it would be a good thing for Lauren whether she reveals Adam's name or not. Just as Danny has OHW to seek advice and unload, Lauren may need a place to do the same - in addition to Danny. They've done pretty well to this point and I'm for their continued success. They seem to be able to sort through this pretty well.
We should feel privileged Danny is including us as spectators. I do. I like the guy.
Then in phase2, she dumped that restriction and decided to screw Adam who is family and a stay at home lover!
But Danny had made it very clear when step dad & co were here last time that he doesn't want any spill over onto the family radar.
Lauren confiding in sister and BFF, makes this thing kinda public. Lauren usually ain't the impulsive type. But this recent stripper shindig and what followed, is playing at the back of her mind. She hasn't had a heart to heart with Danny on this.
Last time when she was in a brooding phase with Danny excluded, was after the dating fiasco.. That's when she had done something uncharacteristic after a week's brooding. She had reestablished contact with a 42 yr old high school teacher and started a virtual affair..
This time she is on a girls trip where sex, guys and raunchy talk is de rigueur after wine and laughs. There may be talk about flirting outside relationships.. about male strippers in so and so's Bachelorette party.. male masseur... so and so hitting on so and so.
I guess it all depends on Lauren's mood and what actually is going on in her heart. Disgust and self loathing? Reviewing Danny's character and role in her life? Or acceptance and a -fuck it let's continue - attitude. Interesting possibilities.
I think you may be onto something. I couldn't see the point of including the plot element of Lauren suddenly deciding to go off to NYC for a few days.Luigical1931 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 4:21 amThe problem with telling somebody you trust, is that they then have somebody they trust not to tell anybody, then that person has somebody they trust. Before you know it, everybody knows.
Tell your sister, she then tells her partner, he then tells his best friend…
Except you can't normally do that, as invariably you'll get a message saying.... "Sorry but you cannot use search at this time. The server has high load. Please try again later."wannabecUKold wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 2:54 amTell us to STFU? No. If you don’t want the comments, read Danny’s posts via his username page.
I’m not sure that’s where I was going with it haha.trecital wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 7:28 amI think you may be onto something. I couldn't see the point of including the plot element of Lauren suddenly deciding to go off to NYC for a few days.Luigical1931 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 4:21 amThe problem with telling somebody you trust, is that they then have somebody they trust not to tell anybody, then that person has somebody they trust. Before you know it, everybody knows.
Tell your sister, she then tells her partner, he then tells his best friend…
Now it makes sense. She confides in her sister, who confides in someone else, and before you know it someone is asking Adam if he is fucking Lauren. Adam then realises that Danny knows. One evening when Adam's enormous cock has just given Lauren her twentieth orgasm, Adam goes to his bedroom door, opens it and sees Danny in his pyjamas, his little stiff dick sticking out. He realises that Danny was listening in and masturbating. Danny gets frog marched into Adam's bedroom. Then gets forced to clean up Adam's multiple cream pies.
At which point this thread will really explode.
Absolutely.Luigical1931 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 4:21 amIf you want something to stay a secret, don’t tell anybody.
The problem with telling somebody you trust, is that they then have somebody they trust not to tell anybody, then that person has somebody they trust. Before you know it, everybody knows.
The only person you can really trust is telling somebody who has something to lose if they tell anybody (not the best example, but she can tell Danny everything, because he’s got a lot to lose if people find out).
Tell your sister, she then tells her partner, he then tells his best friend…
Touche'. Most comments are ok. But some are just over the top.wannabecUKold wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 2:54 amThere are 1,554 posts on this thread. Danny has posted 239 posts almost all of them on this thread. So there are five or six responses to every post by him. Dan’s posts alone would take up a dozen or so pages. But without any responses, I doubt that Danny would be posting.Cuckcuckgoose1 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 12:46 pm100%. I wish some posters would just STFU.Dream Weaver wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2024 10:57 amSo many people have turned this into a choose your own adventure tale.
This thread is a human drama, involving young people in their sexual relationship. Readers obviously want to comment. Often the responses are just a “wow“ plus a comment on some dramatic aspect of what has happened. Many responses are thoughtful, bringing a lot of mature experience and wisdom. Some encourage Danny and quite a few caution him. Inevitably some responses are a bit iffy, wank material, and Danny has complained about one poster. But overall, I think the responses give Danny a lot of food for thought.
Tell us to STFU? No. If you don’t want the comments, read Danny’s posts via his username page.
Surely RunDannyRun is solely responsible for this 'caper', as you so aptly describe it?sandy691196 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 8:33 am...whether she (as usual) blames Danny in someway for this caper..
So, what you are saying is, if things had happened differently then things would have turned out differently?sandy691196 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 9:11 amEveryone is responsible.
Everyone has / had the ability to respond (responsibility) differently in this triad. If they/she/he responded differently then the outcome would have been different..
Yatrecital wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 9:25 amSo, what you are saying is, if things had happened differently then things would have turned out differently?sandy691196 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 9:11 amEveryone is responsible.
Everyone has / had the ability to respond (responsibility) differently in this triad. If they/she/he responded differently then the outcome would have been different..
trecital wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 9:25 amSo, what you are saying is, if things had happened differently then things would have turned out differently?sandy691196 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 9:11 amEveryone is responsible.
Everyone has / had the ability to respond (responsibility) differently in this triad. If they/she/he responded differently then the outcome would have been different..

The U.S. Department of Justice defines rape as “the penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”3 The federal government uses this legal definition to collect information from local police about rape. The legal definition of rape may be slightly different in your community.sandy691196 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:07 amI am sorry to say that this is pure, unalloyed BS.. Lauren DID NOT withdraw consent at any stage, at any time, on any day. When she woke up with his dick in her pussy, she could have "withdrawn consent" right away or after collecting her wits. Instead she CHOSE to keep getting royally fucked, moaning all the time, audible to Danny in the next room (as described by Danny here - the 3rd round) and then coming multiple times over the next half an hour!FNQLivin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 11:33 pmI think a few people here are not understanding the modern definition of consent, as it relates to sex. A woman can, at any time, withdraw consent. If you do not stop at that point, you are committing a sexual assault.
In Australian classrooms, boys and girls are taught that consent must be sought and must be obtained before sexual activity takes place. They are also taught how that doesn’t need to remove spontaneity nor ruin fun. You cannot assume that because someone previously consented, that that consent continues.
With luck and over time, we will all learn this and then us men will also realise that there by the grace of god, we are not convicted sex predators, because women have been being sexually assaulted for Millenia and just had to accept it.
Simply, don’t put your dick in a sleeping woman, unless she had previously said, “hey, I really would like you to fuck me when you wake up”
If this is "rape" it just shows how deeply nonsensical, unscientific and non functional this "modern definitions" have made normal human society. As per the science of communication- 93% of all feelings and emotions are communicated nonverbally. Verbose and verbal communication is effective and relevant to data, information, facts, business transactions and the weather!
This is just gaslighting the male partner ex post facto. Sex is not a business transaction or even a sports item. Its a deeply passionate and emotional thing. The lure of the unknown and breaking new ground, doing new things feed this passion. Many women have described the awesome excitement inherent in waking up the partner's dick in her pussy! Or tapping her lips! People who don't know these things- know nothing about sex! I have met plenty of girls who, while describing past "missed opportunities", said - "I so wish he had come and kissed me (or held me or hugged me or initiated stuff proactively without making her say yes explicitly. Often a woman doesnt wanna ruin it by making it verbose!
Just because in "Australian class rooms" (and all over woke lands), they preach that "it doesn't take away from spontaneity" doesn't mean that it doesn't kill spontaneity by making sex a game of Russian Roulette.
And malicious BS like saying "men have been predators all through history and have raped their women down the ages and we are lucky as a gender not to have been prosecuted since they didnt complain" is what has destroyed the noble concept of liberalism. These Trojan Horses infiltrated the Liberal camp and made it implode. When the rabid RW disparagingly call Liberals "cuck boys".. we must realise that these sickos in the Liberal camp have made all of us look like sacrificial, dumb, self destructing lab animals in the minefields of social engineering! Recently a Canadian lady politician (wont name her) said on social media, in response to this kinda nonsense - "if my husband has to take affirmative consent when he kisses me, I would much rather he didnt kiss me"!
I am sorry for this rant. But this gender apartheid nonsense on a sex positive site, can't be allowed to ride..
Get over it - they are in bed together many times- in & outta sleep having sex multiple times , stop hatin - let it go dudevicouple wrote: ↑Sat Dec 28, 2024 10:36 amThe U.S. Department of Justice defines rape as “the penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.”3 The federal government uses this legal definition to collect information from local police about rape. The legal definition of rape may be slightly different in your community.sandy691196 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 12:07 amI am sorry to say that this is pure, unalloyed BS.. Lauren DID NOT withdraw consent at any stage, at any time, on any day. When she woke up with his dick in her pussy, she could have "withdrawn consent" right away or after collecting her wits. Instead she CHOSE to keep getting royally fucked, moaning all the time, audible to Danny in the next room (as described by Danny here - the 3rd round) and then coming multiple times over the next half an hour!FNQLivin wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 11:33 pmI think a few people here are not understanding the modern definition of consent, as it relates to sex. A woman can, at any time, withdraw consent. If you do not stop at that point, you are committing a sexual assault.
In Australian classrooms, boys and girls are taught that consent must be sought and must be obtained before sexual activity takes place. They are also taught how that doesn’t need to remove spontaneity nor ruin fun. You cannot assume that because someone previously consented, that that consent continues.
With luck and over time, we will all learn this and then us men will also realise that there by the grace of god, we are not convicted sex predators, because women have been being sexually assaulted for Millenia and just had to accept it.
Simply, don’t put your dick in a sleeping woman, unless she had previously said, “hey, I really would like you to fuck me when you wake up”
If this is "rape" it just shows how deeply nonsensical, unscientific and non functional this "modern definitions" have made normal human society. As per the science of communication- 93% of all feelings and emotions are communicated nonverbally. Verbose and verbal communication is effective and relevant to data, information, facts, business transactions and the weather!
This is just gaslighting the male partner ex post facto. Sex is not a business transaction or even a sports item. Its a deeply passionate and emotional thing. The lure of the unknown and breaking new ground, doing new things feed this passion. Many women have described the awesome excitement inherent in waking up the partner's dick in her pussy! Or tapping her lips! People who don't know these things- know nothing about sex! I have met plenty of girls who, while describing past "missed opportunities", said - "I so wish he had come and kissed me (or held me or hugged me or initiated stuff proactively without making her say yes explicitly. Often a woman doesnt wanna ruin it by making it verbose!
Just because in "Australian class rooms" (and all over woke lands), they preach that "it doesn't take away from spontaneity" doesn't mean that it doesn't kill spontaneity by making sex a game of Russian Roulette.
And malicious BS like saying "men have been predators all through history and have raped their women down the ages and we are lucky as a gender not to have been prosecuted since they didnt complain" is what has destroyed the noble concept of liberalism. These Trojan Horses infiltrated the Liberal camp and made it implode. When the rabid RW disparagingly call Liberals "cuck boys".. we must realise that these sickos in the Liberal camp have made all of us look like sacrificial, dumb, self destructing lab animals in the minefields of social engineering! Recently a Canadian lady politician (wont name her) said on social media, in response to this kinda nonsense - "if my husband has to take affirmative consent when he kisses me, I would much rather he didnt kiss me"!
I am sorry for this rant. But this gender apartheid nonsense on a sex positive site, can't be allowed to ride..
Giving your consent means giving a clear “yes” to any type of sexual activity, though the laws about consent vary from state to state. It is also rape when penetration takes place when you are drunk, high, drugged, passed out, or asleep and cannot give consent. People under the age of 18 (in most states) cannot give consent to sexual activity with an adult.
Enough said. What was done is against the law. Each situation is different but sticking your dick in someone without asking because once you heard about a women who liked it that way is not an excuse that is likely to stand up in court.