It might actually happen after years of telling me no.

[FadermanL20]

This is the first article I could find on the subject, but it isn't the paper I read.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/434wxb/ ... the-a-spot

[Long Lurker 34]

Are you guys aware of the anterior/posterior fornyx? Supposedly the cervix retracts and the area behind the cervix is very sensitive-but only men with lots of length can reach it. We figured this was why she desired the extra length. We've experimented with this but it hasn't produced any results.

When I got together with my wife, she would jump through the headboard everytime I touched her cervix.
I had to use half my length for at least a year or so which was fine, she cums plenty on just the girth.
Over time she was able to get used to the cervix sensation and I was able to "bottom out" in her without her being uncomfortable.
Now she actually enjoys it, I can "massage" her cervix area with barely any movement/thrusting and make her cum repeatedly from it or I can pound away at it and she enjoys that too.
I couldn't tell you if that's the anterior/posterior fornyx or not but it's around the "bottoming out" area.
Maybe her cervix has learned to retract as you say? I don't know but she definitely loves length as well as girth now which for a long time she thought she never would.

Yes. If she is lying on her back and you were to insert a finger or two and trace along the top part of her vagina, go back until just before her cervix, that's the anterior fornyx. It's supposed to be pretty pleasurable, every woman is different. My wife liked it, but it was too easy to hit her cervix by mistake-especially when she's moving around. (grin)

If you were to do the same for the bottom part of her vagina, it's a deeper channel, right? that's the posterior fornyx. That area, if properly stimulated is supposed to be EXTREMELY sensitive. I believe there are videos on this. I remember reading a paper on this once, but I can't cite the source, because it's been so long ago-but you should be able to search for it. My problem is that I could reach my wife's anterior and the cervix itself, but I'm not long enough to get beyond. A source of great frustration for me. We tried a dildo, but it's too stiff and wasn't pleasurable for her-I think it needs to be something as pliable as a cock to do the trick.

FL20 - You seem well versed with human anatomy I must say.
So is the anterior fornyx the samething as the C-spot?

[FadermanL20]

Are you guys aware of the anterior/posterior fornyx? Supposedly the cervix retracts and the area behind the cervix is very sensitive-but only men with lots of length can reach it. We figured this was why she desired the extra length. We've experimented with this but it hasn't produced any results.

When I got together with my wife, she would jump through the headboard everytime I touched her cervix.
I had to use half my length for at least a year or so which was fine, she cums plenty on just the girth.
Over time she was able to get used to the cervix sensation and I was able to "bottom out" in her without her being uncomfortable.
Now she actually enjoys it, I can "massage" her cervix area with barely any movement/thrusting and make her cum repeatedly from it or I can pound away at it and she enjoys that too.
I couldn't tell you if that's the anterior/posterior fornyx or not but it's around the "bottoming out" area.
Maybe her cervix has learned to retract as you say? I don't know but she definitely loves length as well as girth now which for a long time she thought she never would.

Yes. If she is lying on her back and you were to insert a finger or two and trace along the top part of her vagina, go back until just before her cervix, that's the anterior fornyx. It's supposed to be pretty pleasurable, every woman is different. My wife liked it, but it was too easy to hit her cervix by mistake-especially when she's moving around. (grin)

If you were to do the same for the bottom part of her vagina, it's a deeper channel, right? that's the posterior fornyx. That area, if properly stimulated is supposed to be EXTREMELY sensitive. I believe there are videos on this. I remember reading a paper on this once, but I can't cite the source, because it's been so long ago-but you should be able to search for it. My problem is that I could reach my wife's anterior and the cervix itself, but I'm not long enough to get beyond. A source of great frustration for me. We tried a dildo, but it's too stiff and wasn't pleasurable for her-I think it needs to be something as pliable as a cock to do the trick.

FL20 - You seem well versed with human anatomy I must say.
So is the anterior fornyx the samething as the C-spot?

TBH, I had no idea what a C-spot was until I looked it up. Sounds like that though. I'm not a medical person, not an expert. I just read.
From what I read, the Cspot is behind the cervix, anterior is at the front-when viewed from the side.
But, again-NOT an expert.
I've had a fascination with certain aspects of female behavior since high school. I'm just trying answers to questions. Then only to find more questions. Damn this curiosity!
Sorry 777, not trying to thread jack. You guys are the stars of this show.

[w770]

When I got together with my wife, she would jump through the headboard everytime I touched her cervix.
I had to use half my length for at least a year or so which was fine, she cums plenty on just the girth.
Over time she was able to get used to the cervix sensation and I was able to "bottom out" in her without her being uncomfortable.
Now she actually enjoys it, I can "massage" her cervix area with barely any movement/thrusting and make her cum repeatedly from it or I can pound away at it and she enjoys that too.
I couldn't tell you if that's the anterior/posterior fornyx or not but it's around the "bottoming out" area.
Maybe her cervix has learned to retract as you say? I don't know but she definitely loves length as well as girth now which for a long time she thought she never would.

Yes. If she is lying on her back and you were to insert a finger or two and trace along the top part of her vagina, go back until just before her cervix, that's the anterior fornyx. It's supposed to be pretty pleasurable, every woman is different. My wife liked it, but it was too easy to hit her cervix by mistake-especially when she's moving around. (grin)

If you were to do the same for the bottom part of her vagina, it's a deeper channel, right? that's the posterior fornyx. That area, if properly stimulated is supposed to be EXTREMELY sensitive. I believe there are videos on this. I remember reading a paper on this once, but I can't cite the source, because it's been so long ago-but you should be able to search for it. My problem is that I could reach my wife's anterior and the cervix itself, but I'm not long enough to get beyond. A source of great frustration for me. We tried a dildo, but it's too stiff and wasn't pleasurable for her-I think it needs to be something as pliable as a cock to do the trick.

FL20 - You seem well versed with human anatomy I must say.
So is the anterior fornyx the samething as the C-spot?

TBH, I had no idea what a C-spot was until I looked it up. Sounds like that though. I'm not a medical person, not an expert. I just read.
From what I read, the Cspot is behind the cervix, anterior is at the front-when viewed from the side.
But, again-NOT an expert.
I've had a fascination with certain aspects of female behavior since high school. I'm just trying answers to questions. Then only to find more questions. Damn this curiosity!
Sorry 777, not trying to thread jack. You guys are the stars of this show.

No worries! This is all really interesting.

[Wifesharing]

Do you think she should message with Superman a little bit during this week I mean it is nice for all three of you to keep the fire hot.

I do think this week away was a good idea

[w770]

Do you think she should message with Superman a little bit during this week I mean it is nice for all three of you to keep the fire hot.

I do think this week away was a good idea

Well he's been texting her pretty regularly to keep her thinking of him. She's so far ignored him all day, but she'll likely get back to him in time. We're hoping that next weekend will be the next time they fuck on our bed, and depending on how I feel, I might be watching or at the very least listening.

It's giving me angst just typing that out.

[FadermanL20]

Want to turn the tables a little?

Have Lana text SM with some rules for him to follow while she's out of town.

1. No banging other women until she gets back
2. No jerking off until she gets back.

Let him know that you and her will be fucking and sucking every night this week. She wants jump from one cock to another and she wants him fresh when she gets back into town. See how he handles a little angst. Have her send a sexy pic-but without her face, maybe a bra shot or something. Maybe even a shot of her sucking your dick (nothing but your chest and her hair), if she feels adventurous. Let SM have some sloppy seconds.

I was 25 once. He'll cum like a geyser. You can thank my wife for this. Enjoy!

[william70]

Something hypothetical you can talk to your wife about. Lana is on her back. Spmn has just come in her. He continues laying on top of her with his cock still in her (basking if you will). He knows your rules so he asks Lana if she's thirsty and would she like for him to get them drinks. She tells him "do not move". She looks at you to go get them drinks. Do you jump up and get them?

[Mr1SexyGILF]

I might be getting mixed up between threads, but I was under the impression the OP wasn't particularly small? Admittedly everything is relative.

Chris

At beginning of Feb this year w770 started a thread entitled "It actually turns me on having a small cock".
In this thread he posted that " I feel like I've gone from 5-6 inches to 4 now, and not thick at all."
I'm pretty sure that somewhere else he posted that he was 5". So I'm a bit confused, but it seems to be somewhere between 4" to 6".

In the same thread I mentioned above, w770 also said "She tells me that the biggest she's ever had was 8-9 inches and really thick."

Back in this thread w770 said "So my wife's biggest in college was this guy named Alex, a guy from the UK who was 8 inches, uncut, and very thick. He's been the reference point in a lot of our conversations about this subject and I'll find myself asking "was he bigger than Alex?" to her stories of other guys.
Apparently Superman is bigger than Alex which is crazy considering that Lana has a toy that's about 8 inches and when I look at it, it seriously dwarfs me and my 5 inches, not thick, so I can't imagine what Superman's is like for her."

So maybe Sman is approaching 10", but I'm not sure about that. So, we could have a contrast of 4" to 10".
If we put some measurements into the Visualiser cock comparison site (one of my favourites!), this calculates a volume for w770 at 76cc (4.6 cubic inches) compared to Sman at a massive 681cc (41.5 cubic inches). Nearly 9X the size!
Bear in mind that this is the most extreme from the above possibilities. If we go for the more modest 5" and keep Sman at a par with Lana's previous biggest of 8-9 inches, but go with 8, then the figures are: 106cc (6.5 cubic inches) for w770 and 400cc (24.4 cubic inches) for Sman. So Sman betters w770 by a factor of 4. Or, put another way, w770 has a cock only one quarter the size of Sman. Of course, I have made some assumptions on girth, as I've only got "not thick at all" and 'very thick' to go by.

Given the above, then when w770 is having reclaim sex then I'm surprised that he gets any of Sman's cum on his cock at all. It must barely touch the sides of Lana's stretched pussy!

Sorry w770. Just having a bit of fun at your expense!

T - Please continue with your analysis. We still need to learn about top of cam, compression, torque, brake horsepower and rotation.

LL, I actually “Laughed Out Loud” when I read your comment. As a fellow Motorhead, I had the same exact response when T started drawing comparisons in ccs and cubic inches.

Regarding the analogy common in Motorsports,“There’s no Replacement for Displacement”, Maybe this analogy also applies to the age old discussion “Does size really matter”.

Mr GILF

[trecital]

I might be getting mixed up between threads, but I was under the impression the OP wasn't particularly small? Admittedly everything is relative.

Chris

At beginning of Feb this year w770 started a thread entitled "It actually turns me on having a small cock".
In this thread he posted that " I feel like I've gone from 5-6 inches to 4 now, and not thick at all."
I'm pretty sure that somewhere else he posted that he was 5". So I'm a bit confused, but it seems to be somewhere between 4" to 6".

In the same thread I mentioned above, w770 also said "She tells me that the biggest she's ever had was 8-9 inches and really thick."

Back in this thread w770 said "So my wife's biggest in college was this guy named Alex, a guy from the UK who was 8 inches, uncut, and very thick. He's been the reference point in a lot of our conversations about this subject and I'll find myself asking "was he bigger than Alex?" to her stories of other guys.
Apparently Superman is bigger than Alex which is crazy considering that Lana has a toy that's about 8 inches and when I look at it, it seriously dwarfs me and my 5 inches, not thick, so I can't imagine what Superman's is like for her."

So maybe Sman is approaching 10", but I'm not sure about that. So, we could have a contrast of 4" to 10".
If we put some measurements into the Visualiser cock comparison site (one of my favourites!), this calculates a volume for w770 at 76cc (4.6 cubic inches) compared to Sman at a massive 681cc (41.5 cubic inches). Nearly 9X the size!
Bear in mind that this is the most extreme from the above possibilities. If we go for the more modest 5" and keep Sman at a par with Lana's previous biggest of 8-9 inches, but go with 8, then the figures are: 106cc (6.5 cubic inches) for w770 and 400cc (24.4 cubic inches) for Sman. So Sman betters w770 by a factor of 4. Or, put another way, w770 has a cock only one quarter the size of Sman. Of course, I have made some assumptions on girth, as I've only got "not thick at all" and 'very thick' to go by.

Given the above, then when w770 is having reclaim sex then I'm surprised that he gets any of Sman's cum on his cock at all. It must barely touch the sides of Lana's stretched pussy!

Sorry w770. Just having a bit of fun at your expense!

T - Please continue with your analysis. We still need to learn about top of cam, compression, torque, brake horsepower and rotation.

LL, I actually “Laughed Out Loud” when I read your comment. As a fellow Motorhead, I had the same exact response when T started drawing comparisons in ccs and cubic inches.

Regarding the analogy common in Motorsports,“There’s no Replacement for Displacement”, Maybe this analogy also applies to the age old discussion “Does size really matter”.

Mr GILF

Mr Gilf, didn't you mean to say "Petrolhead", rather than "Motorhead"? Or is 'motorhead' used in the US?

I'd always heard the phrase "There is no substitute for cubic inches", or similar variations. Except for a large dildo perhaps? Or a cock sleeve?

The 'no substitute for cubic inches' was probably correct until the introduction of the modern reliable turbocharger.
Not sure what is the sexual equivalent of the turbocharger. Viagra maybe?

“There’s no Replacement for Displacement”....in a cuck context.....does this mean that once the 'bull' gets a go, the cuck is 'displaced', never to fuck his wife again? Thus being 'replaced'.

I've had a think about "top of cam, compression, torque, brake horsepower and rotation", but can't come up with a cuck connection.

[Mr1SexyGILF]

I am in absolute awe of this amazing journey. You were already 33 pages in when I discovered it, and I just now finally caught up.

Thank You for the time and effort you have invested to bring us all along. I am impressed at how politely you responded to rude comments.

For whatever it is worth, I quite envy the situation you have found yourselves in. Kudos on your commitment to excellent communication.

My conclusion is that your lives have been enriched by this experience thus far. I greatly respect your decision to step back and reassess.

Dogs have played a very important and memorable role in our 45 years of marriage. I cannot resist asking what sex and breed your dogs are.

Mr GILF

[w770]

Want to turn the tables a little?

Have Lana text SM with some rules for him to follow while she's out of town.

1. No banging other women until she gets back
2. No jerking off until she gets back.

Let him know that you and her will be fucking and sucking every night this week. She wants jump from one cock to another and she wants him fresh when she gets back into town. See how he handles a little angst. Have her send a sexy pic-but without her face, maybe a bra shot or something. Maybe even a shot of her sucking your dick (nothing but your chest and her hair), if she feels adventurous. Let SM have some sloppy seconds.

I was 25 once. He'll cum like a geyser. You can thank my wife for this. Enjoy!

It's an interesting thought, however I think she really revels in the dynamic between them where he is dominant and she is submissive to him. But you touched upon another idea that her and I talked about last night when I saw her in her bra and panties, and that is possibly sending him some picture messages. So far he's texted her over ten times with no response, basically making sure that he stays on the top of her mind, and we were considering sending him a sexy picture back with no message attached. It's just an idea and it would just be for fun that we may or may not do, but honestly, it's just been nice having it be just us for the last few days.

Something hypothetical you can talk to your wife about. Lana is on her back. Spmn has just come in her. He continues laying on top of her with his cock still in her (basking if you will). He knows your rules so he asks Lana if she's thirsty and would she like for him to get them drinks. She tells him "do not move". She looks at you to go get them drinks. Do you jump up and get them?

This is a good hypothetical loophole, but I would still say no. Early on in our relationship, Lana admitted to me that she has taken advantage of past boyfriends before and since she really liked me, she told me to tell her if I ever felt like she was doing that to me so she would know to stop (she can sometimes be oblivious to her own behavior). Since we were in grad school at the time, I would always run out and grab us coffee, but there was a particular day when I was deeply focused on one subject and it was also snowing heavily at the time, when she asked if I could go get her and her friend coffee. So I responded with, "this is one of those times I think you're trying to take advantage of me, so no." She actually respected me a lot for this, and as she bundled up with her friend to run down to the coffee shop, I said, "oh and bring me back one too, thanks." She's always been attracted to the fact that she can't bulldoze me like she sees a lot of her friends and how they interact with their husbands, so in the hypothetical you posed, I would definitely tell her that she or he could grab their own drinks.

[w770]

I am in absolute awe of this amazing journey. You were already 33 pages in when I discovered it, and I just now finally caught up.

Thank You for the time and effort you have invested to bring us all along. I am impressed at how politely you responded to rude comments.

For whatever it is worth, I quite envy the situation you have found yourselves in. Kudos on your commitment to excellent communication.

My conclusion is that your lives have been enriched by this experience thus far. I greatly respect your decision to step back and reassess.

Dogs have played a very important and memorable role in our 45 years of marriage. I cannot resist asking what sex and breed your dogs are.

Mr GILF

Thank you for the comment. And you are quite right, we feel like our lives have been enriched from these last few weeks, we've grown closer, and we're having 100x more sex than we were having prior to Superman.

We have two corgis, who also happen to be the world's most spoiled dogs. I was curious how they would respond to Superman coming over that first day and fucking Lana in our bed. But like they always do whenever Lana and I have sex, they both go into the other room to hide until they can hear that it's over. It's funny, whenever they hear me cum, they take that as their sign to come back to the bedroom. No idea what their reasoning is either.

[whenwillshe]

Corgis!
No wonder it takes a long time to walk them.
They have no legs!

[Libertine_Lark]

W770,

Thanks so much for the time and effort you’ve put into recapturing the events surrounding you and Lana’s journey this far. You are an eloquent writer. As I read, I can’t help but draw some parallels to my own journey back in 2016 when I found myself, for lack of a better term, hungover from intense pleasure following a third sex-fueled meeting inside of five days. It was actually too much of a good thing. Law of diminishing marginal utility.

With this in mind, my question is about Lana’s initial take on this week-long respite… I find it fascinating that you, as a couple, made the collective decision to step away from Superman for a a few days. What was Lana’s position on this? Did she too need to step back, for her own sake? Or was this driven by your assessment that things were moving too quickly? More directly, has Lana expressed (or even implied) that her judgement was becoming clouded by the intense sexual chemistry at play? Odd as it sounds, that a wife’s judgement could be impaired by sex is supremely sexy (to me anyway). It’s reflective, somehow, of a more primal trait I very much enjoy seeing some experiences doicumented on this forum. The cock-crazy wanton hotwife sort of theme, which I sensed in this thread.

Again, thank you for your efforts documenting all of this. We all learn from each other on this board. Best of luck on this trip. Mine ended (beautifully) nearly seven years ago and I still cherish the experience. Enjoy the ride.

Will

[w770]

Corgis!
No wonder it takes a long time to walk them.
They have no legs!

Yeah they're basically giant loaves of bread with four undersized legs.

I forgot to mention - last night, as we were getting amorous, Lana and I decided to play out a mild simulation where she would be in the bedroom with her toy while I touched myself on the couch of the other room. So I listened in as she started moaning, and as her breathing got a bit heavier, her teasing dirty talk started getting raunchier. "Fuck my pussy [his name]!" "Oh God, I love your cock [his name]." It wasn't until she started moaning his name over and over that I got up from the couch and looked in the bedroom, watching her on her back, legs spread, one hand pinching one of her nipples as she fucked herself with her toy, as she came hard and convulsed repeatedly.

She noticed me at the door and motioned me over. The hotel provided a couples sex kit which included a small pack of lube, which she emptied the entire bottle into her pussy for me to then mount her as we fucked, imagining it was his cum she was filled up with. "Do you like being a cheating slut for him?" "yes! I'm his little slut, baby. Do you like that he made you a cuck?" "I do..."

I didn't last long, but it was an extremely intense orgasm. We just stared at each other afterwards as I rolled off of her and we lay next to each other, affirming how much we loved each other.

[eventfire]

The hotel provided a sex kit!?

[w770]

W770,

Thanks so much for the time and effort you’ve put into recapturing the events surrounding you and Lana’s journey this far. You are an eloquent writer. As I read, I can’t help but draw some parallels to my own journey back in 2016 when I found myself, for lack of a better term, hungover from intense pleasure following a third sex-fueled meeting inside of five days. It was actually too much of a good thing. Law of diminishing marginal utility.

With this in mind, my question is about Lana’s initial take on this week-long respite… I find it fascinating that you, as a couple, made the collective decision to step away from Superman for a a few days. What was Lana’s position on this? Did she too need to step back, for her own sake? Or was this driven by your assessment that things were moving too quickly? More directly, has Lana expressed (or even implied) that her judgement was becoming clouded by the intense sexual chemistry at play? Odd as it sounds, that a wife’s judgement could be impaired by sex is supremely sexy (to me anyway). It’s reflective, somehow, of a more primal trait I very much enjoy seeing some experiences doicumented on this forum. The cock-crazy wanton hotwife sort of theme, which I sensed in this thread.

Again, thank you for your efforts documenting all of this. We all learn from each other on this board. Best of luck on this trip. Mine ended (beautifully) nearly seven years ago and I still cherish the experience. Enjoy the ride.

Will

Thanks for your kind words! To answer your questions - I first suggested taking a step back when Lana was riding a high of the potential Superman taking her on our bed this weekend. We're typically very good as a couple at checking the other's blindspots when the other is in a state of exuberance, but in this instance, I need to credit this board and those that warned of the speed of progression. She didn't take offense, pout, or show any negative signs when I suggested taking a week in the city to reconnect with each other and reassess the situation, and because we trust each other's judgment, she has no problem with the abrupt change of plans. Now if she had lashed out instead, I would have taken that as a sign that we may have been going down a bad road, so the fact that she reacted positively to my idea definitely calmed some of the growing nerves inside me.

The hotel provided a sex kit!?

Cool, right? It came with a small pack of lube, a mini vibrator, and condoms.

[gulfcpl]

The hotel provided a sex kit!?

That’s a new one.

[leander99]

The hotel provided a sex kit!?

That’s a new one.

Well, it's somewhat unlikely they would have provided a second-hand sex-kit.

Although that might have nicely fit the cuckold theme for w770....

[Oneillfranko]

Any reason why you don’t use ‘his’ name? Do you plan to use it at some point?

[armyguyot1]

Welcome to the forum Onelilfranko.

[william70]

I never heard of a hotel offering sex kits? Unless it was some sort of cheap rent by the hour sex hotel.

[hiki]

I never heard of a hotel offering sex kits? Unless it was some sort of cheap rent by the hour sex hotel.

LOL, quite the opposite. There are some higher end, more enlightened hotels offering such amenities in their mini bars for a modest fee. I have not personally run into such progress but I remember reading an article a decade and a half ago in NY Times. I'm sure you can still find articles on the subject using Google!

[trecital]

"Hotel sex kit"?

That's a bit 'old hat', surely? They should be offering a variety of options.
And Lana should have chosen the 'Hotel cuckold kit'.

Any suggestions as to what that might contain?